$14B Lost as US Clean Energy Projects Cancelled Over Policy Shifts

Subscribe to our free newsletter today to keep up to date with the latest energy, oil and gas news.

Clean energy development in the United States is at a crossroads. Just a year after the Inflation Reduction Act triggered a wave of optimism and investment in renewable energy, more than $14 billion worth of clean energy projects have been cancelled or paused in 2025. Developers cite tax policy uncertainty and proposed legislation aimed at rolling back green energy incentives.

The rise and fall of clean energy investments in the post-IRA boom

The passage of the Inflation Reduction Act in 2022 launched a surge in clean energy activity. Billions were directed toward solar farms, wind turbines, electric vehicle infrastructure, and battery storage facilities. By the end of 2024, companies had announced plans to invest more than $200 billion in renewable energy.

That momentum is now faltering. In the first half of 2025, more than $14 billion in projects have been withdrawn. These include Kore Power’s battery manufacturing facility in Arizona, Bosch’s hydrogen fuel cell initiative in South Carolina, and BorgWarner’s closure of its electric vehicle components factory in Michigan. The effects go beyond financial losses. Approximately 10,000 jobs associated with these projects have disappeared, disrupting local economies and raising questions about long-term workforce development.

How legislative uncertainty is reshaping the renewable energy roadmap

At the center of this disruption is the proposed “One Big Beautiful Bill,” a tax proposal aligned with former President Trump’s energy agenda. If enacted, the bill would repeal or phase out many of the clean energy tax credits introduced under the Inflation Reduction Act. These credits had underpinned financing models for new projects, offering long-term predictability for investors and developers.

With this legislative threat unresolved, lenders and investors are re-evaluating risk. Financing deals once considered secure are now on hold. Developers, particularly those relying on narrow margins or planning multi-phase builds, are scaling back. In public statements and financial disclosures, firms have consistently cited the potential repeal of incentives as a key reason for halting progress.

How states like Georgia and Tennessee are caught in the crossfire

The national debate over clean energy is unfolding across states that had positioned themselves as clean tech hubs. Georgia, with its growing electric vehicle manufacturing base, and Tennessee, home to several solar module suppliers, are among the most affected. These states had capitalized on federal incentives to attract private investment and had begun to build regional clean energy economies.

Now, those same states face job losses, canceled contracts, and diminished investor confidence. State officials have expressed concern over the broader economic fallout. Local suppliers, logistics providers, and service companies tied to the clean energy ecosystem are already seeing reduced activity and project deferrals.

Why global players are watching and what the US stands to lose

The timing of this internal disruption is especially significant in the global context. While the United States debates the future of its energy policy, competitors such as China, Germany, and India continue to advance renewable energy initiatives. China’s dominance in solar panel manufacturing and Europe’s progress in green hydrogen are positioning them as leaders in the global energy race.

Multinational corporations assessing clean energy investments are increasingly prioritizing policy stability. If federal incentives in the United States remain vulnerable to political shifts, capital may shift to more predictable environments. This risks sidelining the US from future innovation and economic opportunities in the global energy transition.

There is still an opportunity to restore confidence. Analysts argue that bipartisan support for clean energy, though uneven, remains rooted in shared goals of job creation, domestic manufacturing, and energy independence. Policymakers can stabilize the sector by clarifying long-term support mechanisms or extending current incentives during legislative debates.

Sources:

• AP News