Natural Gas Leaders Clash with Biden Administration
The Biden Administration’s decision to pause new permits for liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports has sparked intense criticism from US energy executives. At the recent Gastech conference in Houston, leaders from the natural gas sector, including Chevron CEO Mike Wirth and ConocoPhillips CEO Ryan Lance, openly criticised the policy, arguing it undermines both US energy security and global efforts to combat climate change.
Biden’s LNG permitting pause, enacted in early 2024, was framed as a necessary step to assess the environmental impacts of increased LNG exports. However, industry leaders see it differently. Wirth, during his speech at Gastech, described the decision as “self-defeating,” arguing that LNG is essential for replacing coal, which has a far greater carbon footprint. Without US LNG exports, global markets may turn to dirtier sources of energy, potentially worsening climate impacts.
At the core of this conflict is the energy industry’s belief that natural gas serves as a bridge fuel, helping to reduce emissions while renewable energy infrastructure develops. Wirth urged the administration to stop what he calls “attacks on natural gas,” while Lance highlighted the need for permitting reform and faster project approvals.
The Impact of the LNG Export Pause on US Energy Security
Beyond the environmental debate, the energy sector sees the LNG permit pause as a threat to US energy security. Natural gas exports have become a vital part of America’s strategy to support allies, especially in Europe, where nations have sought alternatives to Russian gas amid geopolitical tensions. Any prolonged disruptions to the permitting process could weaken the US’s standing as a reliable energy supplier.
The energy industry warns that halting LNG exports could result in economic harm, not just at home but globally. Wirth and Lance both pointed to the importance of natural gas for supporting the rising electricity demand, particularly from the AI and data centre sectors. As these industries grow, they rely increasingly on natural gas-fired power plants to meet their energy needs.
The administration’s decision to pause LNG exports is seen by environmental groups as a necessary step in the fight against climate change. Methane emissions, a significant by-product of natural gas extraction, have long been a concern, and activists argue that reducing LNG exports is essential for mitigating these impacts. Biden’s policy aims to take a closer look at the long-term environmental costs of continuing to expand natural gas infrastructure.
Energy executives argue that the policy could backfire. Wirth pointed out that switching from coal to natural gas has already played a critical role in reducing global emissions. Data from McKinsey & Co., cited by Wirth, suggests that the shift to natural gas has resulted in twice as much carbon reduction as all wind and solar power combined over the past 15 years. The industry maintains that natural gas remains an indispensable part of the global energy mix, at least for the foreseeable future.
Global Energy Implications
The pause on US LNG export permits has ramifications far beyond American shores. With the US being the world’s largest LNG exporter, any disruptions to its supply chain could lead international buyers, particularly in Asia and Europe, to seek alternative sources. Russia, for example, is poised to fill any gaps left by US exports, further complicating the geopolitical landscape.
Energy leaders warn that if the US cannot guarantee a steady supply of LNG, it risks losing market share to competitors like Russia and Qatar. Lance expressed concern that this would weaken the US’s influence over international energy markets and make allies more dependent on less stable, and often adversarial, nations.
At the same time, Brad Crabtree, an assistant secretary at the US Department of Energy, defended the administration’s broader energy strategy, which includes billions of dollars in funding for new infrastructure projects under the Infrastructure Bill. Despite these projects, industry leaders argue that these investments will be insufficient if permitting delays continue.
Industry Calls for Policy Reforms and Future Outlook
In response to the LNG export permit pause, energy executives have been pushing for comprehensive policy reforms. Wirth has called for a more balanced conversation about the future of energy, emphasizing that the US should adopt an ‘all-in approach, where natural gas continues to play a role alongside renewables.
Lance echoed this sentiment, stressing the need for improved infrastructure to support LNG exports. The US has the potential to double its export capacity by 2030, but industry leaders fear that without swift reforms to the permitting process, these goals may not be achieved.
As the 2024 presidential election approaches, energy policy is expected to be a significant issue, particularly in states like Pennsylvania, where the natural gas industry plays a crucial role in the local economy. While the Biden Administration remains committed to its climate goals, energy executives are calling for a more pragmatic approach that balances environmental concerns with the need for energy security and economic stability.
Sources: