Trump’s Energy Agenda Influences International Fossil Fuel Strategies
The global energy landscape is shifting once again, with the United States at the center of the storm. Under President Donald Trump’s renewed “drill, baby, drill” pledge, the US has doubled down on fossil fuel extraction, reversing previous commitments to clean energy policies. This shift comes at a time when the international community is grappling with the delicate balance between economic growth, energy security, and climate action.
Trump’s energy stance is not only reshaping domestic policy but also sending ripples across global markets. The US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement and aggressive expansion of oil and gas exports have set a precedent that some countries are beginning to follow. From Indonesia to Argentina, nations that had been moving toward clean energy are now questioning their commitments in light of America’s shift in priorities.
At the 2023 UN climate summit in the UAE, world leaders celebrated a historic call to “transition away from fossil fuels.” Yet, concerns are now mounting that this commitment is faltering. The slowing momentum in clean energy investment, coupled with continued growth in fossil fuel consumption, raises serious questions about the future of global climate policy.
Impact on international climate agreements and commitments
The US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement has sent a strong message to the world: climate commitments are not set in stone. As the largest historical emitter of carbon dioxide, America’s policy choices carry weight. With Trump embracing fossil fuels, other countries are finding justification for rethinking their own commitments.
Indonesia, for instance, has publicly questioned the fairness of adhering to international climate goals while major players like the US continue to expand their carbon footprint. Special envoy for climate change and energy Hashim Djojohadikusumo bluntly asked, “If the United States does not want to comply with the international agreement, why should a country like Indonesia comply with it?”
This sentiment is not limited to Southeast Asia. In Argentina, President Javier Milei’s administration has signaled plans to withdraw from the Paris Agreement altogether. Meanwhile, in South Africa, foreign-funded clean energy initiatives are facing new hurdles as policymakers weigh the economic feasibility of phasing out coal while the US continues ramping up fossil fuel production.
The concern among climate advocates is that once a major country like the US weakens its commitments, others will follow suit. This domino effect threatens to slow the global energy transition at a time when scientists warn that carbon emissions must fall by 45% by 2030 to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius.
Influence on global fossil fuel production and exports
The US has long been a powerhouse in energy production, but Trump’s policies have intensified the push to expand fossil fuel exports. His administration has not only increased domestic drilling but also positioned American oil and gas as a key global commodity. With the slogan “We will export American energy all over the world,” Trump has attracted eager buyers looking for a reliable supplier in an increasingly volatile energy market.
India, one of the world’s largest energy consumers, has strengthened its oil and gas trade agreements with the US. Following Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Washington, both countries reaffirmed their commitment to increasing American energy exports to India. Similarly, South Korea, the third-largest importer of liquefied natural gas, has expressed interest in ramping up its purchases from the US, both to address trade imbalances and to bolster energy security.
Japan, too, is looking to diversify its energy supply. JERA, the country’s largest power generator, has signaled plans to buy more American LNG to reduce dependence on Asian suppliers. Meanwhile, oil majors like Equinor and BP are shifting strategies, cutting investments in renewables and focusing on fossil fuel production. With US energy exports becoming more accessible and affordable, these trends could further delay the transition to cleaner alternatives.
Even in the corporate world, energy giants are recalibrating their strategies. Equinor, a Norwegian energy company, recently announced it would cut its renewable energy investments by 50% over the next two years while expanding its fossil fuel operations. BP is expected to follow suit, reinforcing concerns that oil and gas companies see Trump’s policies as a green light to prioritize short-term profits over long-term sustainability.
While proponents argue that increased production enhances energy security and economic growth, critics warn that flooding global markets with cheap fossil fuels undermines decarbonization efforts. Some analysts fear that if the US leverages its energy dominance to pressure other nations into reliance on its oil and gas, it could create long-term obstacles for the global energy transition.
Challenges to the global clean energy transition
Despite record investments in renewable energy, the clean energy transition is facing significant headwinds. Global investment in decarbonization surpassed $2 trillion for the first time last year, but the momentum is slowing. Reports indicate that clean energy growth has not kept pace with rising fossil fuel consumption, raising concerns that progress toward climate goals may stall.
One major challenge is financial. While many countries have pledged to move toward green energy, major banks continue to fund fossil fuel projects at alarming rates. The contradiction between climate commitments and financial backing for oil and gas exploration weakens the incentives for rapid energy transition.
Meanwhile, developing nations argue that without stronger commitments from wealthy countries, they face an unfair burden in the global energy shift. Indonesia’s concerns about justice in emission reductions highlight the tension between economic development and climate action.
The global energy transition is now at a crossroads. While scientists stress the need for urgent carbon reductions—calling for a 45% cut in emissions by 2030—economic and political forces are pulling in the opposite direction. The big question is whether the rest of the world will double down on clean energy to counteract the US’s fossil fuel push or follow America’s lead in delaying climate commitments. The stakes are higher than ever.
Sources:
To keep up-to-dater with our latest energy, oil and gas news, subscribe to our newsletter today.